Re: Arabic letters separated by markup

• Previous message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Tamil split vowel selection and colouring (Re: It is easy to predict the past.)"
• In reply to: Gregg Reynolds: "Re: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Next in thread: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Reply: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Reply: Gregg Reynolds: "Re: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 19:39 -0500 2005-06-14, Gregg Reynolds wrote:

>To me, "plain text" is a purely computational notion. It is
>therefore impossible in principle to judge whether or not an
>arrangement of ink on a page is plain text or not; in fact it is
>meaningless. So what precisely do you mean when you say it is not
>plain text?

Colour is not plain text.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

• Next message: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Previous message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Tamil split vowel selection and colouring (Re: It is easy to predict the past.)"
• In reply to: Gregg Reynolds: "Re: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Next in thread: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Reply: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Reply: Gregg Reynolds: "Re: Arabic letters separated by markup"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 15 2005 - 03:47:27 CDT