From: Mark E. Shoulson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 19:16:52 CDT
Patrick Andries wrote:
> And all this as smileys (far more frequent and sourly missing
> encoding) and their inverted versions are still not encoded ;-)
Isn't that what U+263A and U+263B are? Not sure that inverted versions
make sense, though.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 05 2005 - 19:19:26 CDT