Re: Punctuation character (inverted interrobang) proposed

From: Mark E. Shoulson (
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 19:16:52 CDT

  • Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Punctuation character (inverted interrobang) proposed"

    Patrick Andries wrote:

    > And all this as smileys (far more frequent and sourly missing
    > encoding) and their inverted versions are still not encoded ;-)

    Isn't that what U+263A and U+263B are? Not sure that inverted versions
    make sense, though.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 05 2005 - 19:19:26 CDT