From: Patrick Andries (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 20:01:00 CDT
John Hudson a écrit :
> Michael Everson wrote:
>>> The question, in this case, would be whether these communities use
>>> the inverted interrobang...
>> They *cannot* use it in Unicode.
Well, there is always the PUA.
>> They can use it in TeX, though, where it has been implemented.
> So, do these communities use it in TeX? Patrick was presumably asking
> whether they use it at all.
Exactly. If they are used (by several authors), then they can
legitimately be proposed for encoding. I always thought this was a
simple litmus test, rather than reason by analogy and imagine how people
could be using a rare (defunct ?) American invention in other cultures.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 05 2005 - 20:03:53 CDT