From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 01:38:45 CDT
At 18:01 -0700 2005-09-05, Patrick Andries wrote:
>>They *cannot* use it in Unicode.
>Well, there is always the PUA.
>Exactly. If they are used (by several authors), then they can
>legitimately be proposed for encoding. I always thought this was a
>simple litmus test, rather than reason by analogy and imagine how
>people could be using a rare (defunct?) American invention in other
It is *a* litmus test. It is not the only test which gets applied.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 06 2005 - 01:46:18 CDT