From: Kenneth Whistler (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2006 - 13:27:58 CDT
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> And may be, create a new formal working group separate from the UTC,
> for working on localization issues,
This already exists: the CLDR-TC
> and also send an invitation to ISO to support this working group.
Such invitations are regularly extended through normal Unicode
Consortium liaison relationships with other standards organizations.
> The main problem with ISO is that its members are governments only,
> and they often support only the official languages.
This is a serious issue for work on the Common Locale Data
Repository, but equally serious is the widespread and
continuing perception that *only* ISO can deal with
internationally relevant standards. ISO's claim to ownership
of "International Standards" and of the process of international
standardization gets in the way sometimes when some other
standards development organization (SDO) is working on a technical
standard that has international relevance.
This continually trips up groups dealing with fast-developing
technical standards, on both sides of the perception divide.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 14 2006 - 13:50:54 CDT