Re: Beta version of Unibook 5.1

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Wed Apr 11 2007 - 00:45:53 CST

  • Next message: "RE: Beta version of Unibook 5.1"

    Marnen Laibow-Koser <marnen at marnen dot org> wrote:

    > Frankly, keeping Unibook non-portable seems to go against the Unicode
    > philosophy of inclusion and accessibility. I hope that future
    > versions of Unibook will be developed in a more portable way, or that
    > a similar tool will be developed for non-Windows operating systems.

    I wouldn't construe the non-portability of Unibook as a statement of
    some sort by the Unicode Consortium. Unicode, the character encoding
    standard, is not OS-dependent. Unicode-enabled applications, or even
    tools to assist in the use of Unicode, are allowed to be.

    Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 11 2007 - 00:49:12 CST