From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Apr 11 2007 - 00:45:53 CST
Marnen Laibow-Koser <marnen at marnen dot org> wrote:
> Frankly, keeping Unibook non-portable seems to go against the Unicode
> philosophy of inclusion and accessibility. I hope that future
> versions of Unibook will be developed in a more portable way, or that
> a similar tool will be developed for non-Windows operating systems.
I wouldn't construe the non-portability of Unibook as a statement of
some sort by the Unicode Consortium. Unicode, the character encoding
standard, is not OS-dependent. Unicode-enabled applications, or even
tools to assist in the use of Unicode, are allowed to be.
-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 11 2007 - 00:49:12 CST