From: Christopher Fynn (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jun 07 2007 - 09:17:49 CDT
William J Poser wrote:
> I've never seen the first problematic glyph-complex, but I can
> say with some confidence that it is a mistake since it ends with
> a virama which is followed by a vowel sign, which is impossible.
> Something is wrong.
I seen a handful of examples in old texts where both a virama and vowel
*do* occur on the same conjunct.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 07 2007 - 09:21:40 CDT