Re: Modifier turned i and <sup>turned i

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2007 - 15:19:29 CDT

Next message: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Re: Where is the First> Last> convention documented?"

Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Where is the First> Last> convention documented?"
Maybe in reply to: Denis Jacquerye: "Modifier turned i and <sup>turned i"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Why doesn' the following have this approximate equivalent?
> U+1D4E MODIFIER LETTER SMALL TURNED I;<sup>U+1D09 LATIN SMALL LETTER TURNED I

It was probably an oversight during the initial beta review
for the data file additions for this repertoire. Note
that U+1D4C MODIFIER LETTER SMALL TURNED OPEN E got an
arguably wrong compatiblity decomposition, for a similar reason: the
target base characters were overlooked in the context of the
list of what otherwise are mostly small capital forms for UPA.

Unfortunately, nice as it would be to update both of those,
the requirements of normalization stability prevent it.

--Ken

Next message: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Re: Where is the First> Last> convention documented?"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Where is the First> Last> convention documented?"
Maybe in reply to: Denis Jacquerye: "Modifier turned i and <sup>turned i"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 05 2007 - 15:22:40 CDT