From: Stephane Bortzmeyer (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2007 - 04:14:56 CDT
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 12:54:07PM -0700,
Kenneth Whistler <email@example.com> wrote
a message of 39 lines which said:
> And by popular demand -- since the documentation in that section
> wasn't very enlightening -- the version of UCD.html under
> development for the Unicode 5.1.0 beta now has a much more explicit
Excellent! I applaud.
This leads to another issue in the database format, which I prefer to
discuss here first: why are they ranges in UnicodeData.txt rather than
explicit records for every character? Being explicit would avoid
generating names for the implicit records (something which is not
obvious and not well documented, IMHO).
Or, a variant, why not a DervivedUnicodeData.txt file with the
all the characters?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 06 2007 - 04:19:05 CDT