RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)

From: Jim Melton (
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 12:22:30 CDT

  • Next message: Jim Melton: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"

    Now *there* is a provocative statement!

    I think that would come as a huge shock to scientists of other
    faiths, but, hey, I've been wrong before.


    At 9/29/2007 05:08 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
    >Also widely off-topic...
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: []
    >On Behalf Of William J Poser
    > > It seems to me that "scientific orientation" describes rather well
    > > the materialist, rationalist view that leads one to be dismissive
    > > of revealed religion, especially in its fundamentalist forms.
    >This is interesting, particularly given that rationalism and
    >scientific endeavour as they widely exist in the world today are
    >probably more dependent on Christian theology than any other influence.

    Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144
       Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor Fax : +1.801.942.3345
    1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
    Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: jim at melton dot name
    = Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions =
    = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody =
    = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. =

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 29 2007 - 12:40:47 CDT