From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2007 - 16:33:45 CST
Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:
> Amendment 3 is under ballot. The last-stage ballot is typically a
> Yes/No ballot where no technical changes can be made, but I wonder if
> the rules do not permit the correction of typographic errors. There is
> also a glyph error on the ballot (not in Ol Chiki).
I have no firsthand experience with this process, and no standing to say
anything about it, but my gut feeling is that if an obvious error like
this can't be corrected in this ballot, then there is no point in having
a ballot at all.
Anyone who has implemented the character name OL CHIKI MU TTUDDAG has
been implementing from a preliminary, not-yet-approved standard, and
should not expect to be protected by stability guarantees.
-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://home.roadrunner.com/~dewell http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 24 2007 - 16:35:10 CST