From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2008 - 16:53:41 CDT
At 03:49 +0630 2008-07-08, Ngwe Tun wrote:
>Well, the font that I am working on *is* intended for multi-platform
>use. And, like the Padauk font, it will be given away for free.
>Oh, pleasure to hear that. I will spread that information to other
>forum and wiki.
You don't have to. I have already stated it on two other forums.
Please do not go and speak for me or for Htoo Myint Naung. If people
want to know about Anawrahta they should ask us. Thank you.
>here is example what I'm saying.
>me know how to combine. Which sequence is right solution for MON
>(U+102D + U+1032) or (U+1032 + U+102D). you may know what I'm
>arguing much. In Burmese, first one is right order. Do we need
>specification for unique storage in MON?
I'm not going to try to evaluate something out of context like that.
It sounds as though you are talking about inputting, not "storage".
>Yes, you and Htoo Myint Naung decision is waiting for Aiton and
>Phake characters. Can't we use burmese wikipedia without those
>characters? I do not mentioned that whatever meeting. For the
>burmese context, are we done? Or we need to wait till October
>Meeting. Do you mean 5.1 standards font not covered up for Burmese
>context. You can wait up to fullfill in Myanmar Block.(U1000~U109F).
You are taking all of this out of context and making far more of it
than needs to be made.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 07 2008 - 16:56:38 CDT