From: Mark E. Shoulson (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Dec 27 2008 - 20:59:38 CST
John H. Jenkins wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2008, at 4:52 AM, Julian Bradfield wrote:
>> Yet tengwar are not yet encoded, and Shavian is!
> Tengwar has not been encoded fundamentally because nobody is working
> to move the proposal forward (i.e., actively soliciting support from
> the user community, writing up the documentation necessary for the UTC
> and WG2, getting updates added to the appropriate agendae for
> consideration). It has been proposed and is currently still on the
> list of "scripts to encode."
Whereas Klingon is formally *rejected* and not on the list of scripts to
encode for the crime of being too funny and embarrassing to encode. As
opposed to the much more dignified POOP emoji.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 02 2009 - 15:33:07 CST