Re: Emoji & PUA

From: Christopher Fynn (
Date: Sun Jan 04 2009 - 00:12:13 CST

  • Next message: James Kass: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy" wrote:

    > If if extensive use of a PUA character set is grounds for encoding
    > then the question is how to decide when PUA usage is sufficient
    > for encoding.

    Indeed. There is at least one *national* Standard, GB/T20524-2006
    ("Tibetan Coded Character Set Extension A") which uses the PUA
    [F300-F8FF]. Part B of this standard uses F0000-F16FF.

    These national standards are essentially extensive sets of precomposed
    Tibetan ligatures previously rejected by UTC and WG2 for encoding that
    China then decided to encode in the PUA.

    - Chris

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 04 2009 - 00:14:34 CST