Re: Hand characters (was: +1/-1 in e-mail comments (was: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy))

From: Hans Aberg (haberg@math.su.se)
Date: Thu Jan 08 2009 - 17:29:24 CST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"

    It is only a matter of how far you want to go - perhaps combining
    characters can do it. And the there are signs like putting the left
    hand onto the right elbow, which I do not know what it means. The
    assignment of Unicode code point might speed up again.

       Hans

    On 8 Jan 2009, at 21:23, Kenneth Whistler wrote:

    >> Counting that right/left hands can be used, as well showing front/
    >> back, and four directions, two colors white/black, there are
    >> 2^5*2*2*4*2 = 1024 hand characters.
    >
    > Ah, but this proposal neglects to note that in addition to
    > the 2^5 combinations required to represent all possible combinations
    > of finger extensions for a human hand, some provision needs to
    > be made for lateral finger contact versus separation. Otherwise, there
    > is no way to distinguish:
    >
    > WHITE UP-POINTING PALM OUTWARD ALL FINGERS EXTENDED RIGHT HAND
    >
    > from
    >
    > HALT SIGN
    >
    > or from
    >
    > LIVE LONG AND PROSPER SIGN
    >
    > Nor would this proposal pass muster for its potential discrimination
    > against those born with a sixth digit -- or for that matter,
    > those having lost a digit due to unfortunate accident.
    >
    > Furthermore, I see the need for combinations or control functions
    > to indicate hand orientations involving tip-to-tip articulation
    > between thumb and fingers. Otherwise, there is no way to
    > represent:
    >
    > A-OK SIGN / MONEY SIGN / BRAZILIAN WELL WE WONT GO THERE SIGN



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 08 2009 - 17:33:00 CST