Re: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode

From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven (asmodai@in-nomine.org)
Date: Fri Mar 27 2009 - 00:34:23 CST

Next message: Petr Tomasek: "Re: Byzantine ekpohonetic neumes: any free font?"

Previous message: Tex Texin: "RE: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
In reply to: Leo Broukhis: "Re: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "RE: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable objectcode into Unicode"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "RE: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable objectcode into Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

-On [20090326 20:35], Leo Broukhis (leob@mailcom.com) wrote:
>Is there "the" portable interpretable object code?

I get flashbacks to UNCOL.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Welcome to where Time stands still...

Next message: Petr Tomasek: "Re: Byzantine ekpohonetic neumes: any free font?"
Previous message: Tex Texin: "RE: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
In reply to: Leo Broukhis: "Re: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "RE: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable objectcode into Unicode"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "RE: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable objectcode into Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 27 2009 - 00:37:35 CST