From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven (email@example.com)
Date: Thu May 21 2009 - 13:53:58 CDT
-On [20090520 21:14], Asmus Freytag (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
>At one time there was the (political) line of argumentation that
>encoding Klingon is inherently incompatible with the high-minded,
>business-oriented nature of the Consortium and contemplating such
>encoding would do irreparable harm to the Standard. If that has not been
>repudiated since, such evidence, as the one cited here should give
>impetus to have this stance re-considered.
If the Consortium is adamant on adding the emoji stuff to the standard, I
honestly cannot see why something like Klingon, which actually has speakers,
could not be encoded.
-- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B When Silence cries... Is it what I feel? Or is it what you really long to be..?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 21 2009 - 13:57:04 CDT