From: Shriramana Sharma (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Aug 27 2009 - 19:09:33 CDT
On 2009-Aug-27 12:44, Asmus Freytag wrote:
>> Most of the text in the P&P document that is complicated, is
>> complicated for a reason, and "simplifying" it carries the risk of
>> changing the meaning.
> Couldn't have said it better.
OK more to the point:
I have a character in an Indic script that is not yet encoded. It is
equal in appearance to another character already encoded in a different
block but it should be given a different gc from the existing character.
Will I be allowed to encode it or not, given the disunification
principles? Or would it be done only on a case-by-case basis?
-- Shriramana Sharma
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 27 2009 - 19:11:55 CDT