Re: Superscript comma

From: Leo Broukhis (
Date: Tue Nov 17 2009 - 01:32:15 CST

  • Next message: sergey: "Re: Standartising search for similar symbols"

    You may also want to contact IUPAC and ask if they would like to allow
    U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS as an acceptable alternative to a comma in
    plain text Unicode representations of these chemical names.


    On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Bonniot <> wrote:
    > Hello,
    > The current unicode standards contains some superscript punctuation
    > and mathematical symbols, in
    > . However, it does not
    > contain "SUPERSCRIPT COMMA". This would be useful for representing
    > some technical text, for instance some chemical names. See this page:
    > the text starting
    > with '' below the first picture. For the '2,6' part, the numbers
    > can be displayed as superscript numbers, but not the coma. As far as I
    > know this would be the only character missing to properly represent
    > all chemical names (which is part of my work).
    > Did I miss a correct way to represent this text? Or is there a chance
    > superscript comma could be added to a future version?
    > Best regards,
    > Daniel Bonniot

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 17 2009 - 01:35:17 CST