From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Feb 16 2010 - 08:54:55 CST
Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:
> You snipped the proper context of my reply:
>>>> On the contrary, Unicode has, on occasion, deliberately encoded
>>>> characters for which there was credible evidence of planned
>>>> widespread future use.
>>> Which ones, besides EURO SIGN?
>> There were a plethora of math characters:
Fair enough. Do you feel there is an analogy between the math
compatibility alphabets and the proposed new Tifinagh letters?
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 16 2010 - 08:56:22 CST