From: Hans Aberg (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Feb 16 2010 - 08:41:14 CST
You snipped the proper context of my reply:
>>> On the contrary, Unicode has, on occasion, deliberately encoded
>>> characters for which there was credible evidence of planned
>>> widespread future use.
>> Which ones, besides EURO SIGN?
> There were a plethora of math characters:
On 16 Feb 2010, at 14:34, Doug Ewell wrote:
>> There were a plethora of math characters:
> I doubt I am the only one who fails to see an analogy between the
> mathematical compatibility characters and an effort to encode novel
> letters to support a proposed orthographic reform.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 16 2010 - 08:42:48 CST