From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Apr 01 2010 - 10:42:18 CST
Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at comhem dot se> wrote:
> I understand that you meant this as an April 1 joke, but I would
> (passively) support these actually becoming encoded.
For what purpose? So people could write about the symbols themselves?
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 10:44:31 CST