From: André Szabolcs Szelp (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Apr 12 2010 - 04:33:45 CDT
All I was saying is that disunification should* have been done for all
incorrect "cedilla pro comma" characters, not just S and T.
Of course I know that Unicode is more practice- and industry-driven
* "should" as in an ideal setting.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Michael Everson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The Latvian letters are just fine. People design them with comma-glyphs or they don't find Latvian buyers for their fonts.
> The unification of s-comma-below and s-cedilla *was* a mistake, but it was a mistake which was correctly handled by disunifying them. Unfortunately there is still considerable legacy data in Romanian which uses the Turkish letter.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 12 2010 - 04:36:04 CDT