From: André Szabolcs Szelp (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Apr 12 2010 - 05:28:13 CDT
The proposed disunification would be desirable in scope of the
canonical decompositions, which are immutable.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Michael Everson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2010, at 10:33, André Szabolcs Szelp wrote:
>> All I was saying is that disunification should* have been done for all incorrect "cedilla pro comma" characters, not just S and T.
> No, it shouldn't, because there is no "L avec cedille propre" to my knowledge. WHat *should* have been done was that they ought to have been given their proper names and disunifications, regardless of the name in ISO 8859.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 12 2010 - 05:31:13 CDT