Re: Why does EULER CONSTANT not have math property and PLANCK CONSTANT does?

From: Alex Plantema (
Date: Wed Jul 28 2010 - 02:23:06 CDT

  • Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: High dot/dot above punctuation?"

    Op dinsdag 27 juli 2010 21:07 schreef karl williamson:

    > They are U+2107 and U+210E respectively. Chapter 4 of TUS seems to
    > indicate that neither should, since they both are operands, and it
    > says this property applies to mathematical operators.

    Operands are not operators, e.g. in a+b, a and b are operands, + is an operator.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 28 2010 - 02:26:03 CDT