From: karl williamson (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jul 28 2010 - 23:33:39 CDT
Asmus Freytag wrote:
> On 7/25/2010 6:05 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>> On 2010/07/26 4:37, Asmus Freytag wrote:
>>> PPS: a very hypothetical tough case would be a script where letters
>>> serve both as letters and as decimal place-value digits, and with modern
>>> living practice.
>> Well, there actually is such a script, namely Han. The digits (一、
>> 二、三、四、五、六、七、八、九、〇) are used both as letters and as
>> decimal place-value digits, and they are scattered widely, and of
>> course there are is a lot of modern living practice.
> you found the hidden clue and solved it, first prize :)
> They do not show up as gc=Nd, nor as numeric types Digit or Decimal.
> The situation is worse than you indicate, because the same characters
> are also used as elements in a system that doesn't use place-value, but
> uses special characters to show powers of 10.
Is it the case that a sequence of just these characters, without any
intervening characters, and not adjacent to the special characters you
mention always mean a place-value decimal number?
> However, as I indicated in my original post, in situations like that,
> there are usually some changes in practice that took place. Much of the
> living modern practice in these countries involves ASCII digits. While
> the ideographic numbers are definitely still used in certain contexts,
> I've not seen them in input fields and would frankly doubt that they
> exist there. I would fully expect that they are supported as number
> format for output, at least in some implementations, and, of course,
> that input methods convert ASCII digits into them. In other words, I
> wonder whether automatic conversion goes only one-way for these numbers.
> I would suspect it, for the general case, but I don't actually know for
> For someone in Karl's situation, it would be interesting to learn
> whether and to what extent he should bother supporting these numbers in
> his language extension.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 28 2010 - 23:37:34 CDT