Re: CSUR Tonal

From: Kent Karlsson (kent.karlsson14@telia.com)
Date: Sat Jul 31 2010 - 04:42:43 CDT

  • Next message: Andrew West: "Re: Indian new rupee sign"

    Since no-one else seems to have responded to Luke...

    Den 2010-07-30 22.09, skrev "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>:

    > This isn't about them not looking *exactly* the same, it's about these
    > existing modifiers being inconsistent with each other in visibly noticable
    > ways.

    That is most certainly a font issue, likely a font substitution issue
    (several system try to substitute another font if a glyph is missing for
    some codepoint in the font you selected). Indeed, superscript characters
    may not have been given all that much attention w.r.t. consistency review
    (within each font), especially not between Unicode blocks... (But that is
    just my suspicion!)

        /kent k



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jul 31 2010 - 04:46:22 CDT