Re: Latvian and Marshallese Ad Hoc Report (cedilla and comma below)

From: Martin J. Dürst <>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 17:31:53 +0900

On 2013/07/05 16:04, Denis Jacquerye wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Michael Everson<> wrote:

>> The problem is in pretending that a cedilla and a comma below are equivalent because in some script fonts in France or Turkey routinely write some sort of undifferentiated tick for ç. :-)

Can we make sure we have covered this from the other side? Are there any
languages where there is a letter where both the form with a cedilla and
the form with a comma below are used, and are distinguished? In other
words, are there any languages where a user seeing a wrong form would be
confused as to what the letter is, rather than being potentially
surprised or annoyed at the details of the shape?

Regards, Martin.
Received on Fri Jul 05 2013 - 03:34:04 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 05 2013 - 03:34:04 CDT