From: Andrew West <andrewcwest_at_gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:06:38 +0100

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:06:38 +0100

On 10 August 2016 at 12:21, Costello, Roger L. <costello_at_mitre.org> wrote:

*>
*

*> Do you know if there is another version of the symbol, but with a straight equals sign rather than a slanted equals sign? (The book that I referred to uses a straight equals sign not a slanted equals sign)
*

No, but there are lots of standardized variants for mathematical glyph

variants of this sort (see first section of

http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/StandardizedVariants.txt), so

you could ask the UTC to define two more mathematical standardized

variants:

2A7F FE00; with straight equal; # LESS-THAN OR SLANTED EQUAL TO WITH DOT INSIDE

2A80 FE00; with straight equal; # GREATER-THAN OR SLANTED EQUAL TO

WITH DOT INSIDE

Then all you would need is to get someone to support the new

standardized variants in a math font.

Andrew

Received on Wed Aug 10 2016 - 07:07:36 CDT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0
: Wed Aug 10 2016 - 07:07:36 CDT
*