From: Asmus Freytag (c) <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com>

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:16:45 -0700

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:16:45 -0700

On 8/10/2016 5:06 AM, Andrew West wrote:

*> On 10 August 2016 at 12:21, Costello, Roger L. <costello_at_mitre.org> wrote:
*

*>> Do you know if there is another version of the symbol, but with a straight equals sign rather than a slanted equals sign? (The book that I referred to uses a straight equals sign not a slanted equals sign)
*

*> No, but there are lots of standardized variants for mathematical glyph
*

*> variants of this sort (see first section of
*

*> http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/StandardizedVariants.txt), so
*

*> you could ask the UTC to define two more mathematical standardized
*

*> variants:
*

*>
*

*> 2A7F FE00; with straight equal; # LESS-THAN OR SLANTED EQUAL TO WITH DOT INSIDE
*

*> 2A80 FE00; with straight equal; # GREATER-THAN OR SLANTED EQUAL TO
*

*> WITH DOT INSIDE
*

*>
*

*> Then all you would need is to get someone to support the new
*

*> standardized variants in a math font.
*

*>
*

Unicode does not use standardized variants for that particular

distinctions in the undotted part of that family of symbols.

A./

Received on Wed Aug 10 2016 - 11:23:33 CDT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0
: Wed Aug 10 2016 - 11:23:33 CDT
*