On Wednesday, May 23, 2001, at 01:07 AM, Graham Asher wrote:
> But I guess this is obvious. I just wanted to chime in with the view
> that a
> single Unicode Font would be useful, and a whole lot better than some
> people suggest.
Bear in mind that it is now impossible to produce a single TrueType font
cover all of Unicode.
In any event, what do people perceive as being the advantage of having a
single font that covers the whole standard as opposed to a small suite
of fonts that cover it?
(I'm also speaking from a prejudiced position, because Apple's font
fallback mechanism makes it unnecessary to explicitly set the font for a
particular character in order to see it.)
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:18:17 EDT