On 05/29/2001 05:12:39 PM "N.R.Liwal" wrote:
>I think Calling
>
>CJK specifically Asian is not appropriate nor helpful, because Asia is
big
>
>and have hundreds of languages and scripts, either all Asian Script i.e.
>
>Arabic, Hebrew, Devanagri, Bengali, Thai and etc.......... should be
called
>Asian
>or a more appropriate name should be give to Chiness / Japanese and
Korean
>
>or other scripts of that region.
This is certainly a valid point. "Far East" or "East Asian" might be more
appropriate for CJK.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:18:17 EDT