RE: FAQ entry

From: Kent Karlsson (kentk@md.chalmers.se)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 11:39:59 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)"

Previous message: David Oftedal: "Re: FAQ entry"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: FAQ entry"
Next in thread: Pim Blokland: "Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Reply: Pim Blokland: "Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Actually, it is of orthographic significance: it is not
> uncommon for good fonts to have an fj ligature.

That typography, not orthography.

But I would appreciate if more fonts had an fj ligature, and
(e.g.) a gj ligature too (in some fonts gj otherwise have
overlapping glyphs).

/kent k

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: FAQ entry (was: Looking for information on the UnicodeData file)"
Previous message: David Oftedal: "Re: FAQ entry"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: FAQ entry"
Next in thread: Pim Blokland: "Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Reply: Pim Blokland: "Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 12:13:36 EST