Re: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)

From: Pim Blokland (pblokland@planet.nl)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 08:51:47 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Ligatures (qj)"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Normalized text in OS X?"
In reply to: Kent Karlsson: "RE: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Ligatures (qj)"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Ligatures (qj)"
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kent Karlsson schreef:

> occurrences of fé, fä, få, and fö, where the f may
> in some(!) fonts overlap with the (apparent!) diacritic.

Of course. Similar problems exist in other languages: German has fä,
fö, fü; Dutch has fà, fè, fì, fò etc. Time to update those ligature
tables!
I haven't been able to find any occurrences of qj though. Maybe I
was a bit hasty in suggesting qj might be needed as a ligature.

Pim Blokland

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Ligatures (qj)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Normalized text in OS X?"
In reply to: Kent Karlsson: "RE: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Ligatures (qj)"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Ligatures (qj)"
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: Ligatures (was: FAQ entry)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:46:30 EST