Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script (was Re: why Aramaic now)

From: Christopher John Fynn (cfynn@gmx.net)
Date: Sat Dec 27 2003 - 17:08:09 EST

Next message: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
In reply to: Elaine Keown: "Re: [hebrew] Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script (was Re: why Aramaic now)"
Next in thread: Elaine Keown: "Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script (was Re: why Aramaic now)"
Reply: Elaine Keown: "Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script (was Re: why Aramaic now)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Elaine Keown <elaine_keown@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I have only heard that they had
> different opinions at Harvard and at UChicago. I
> don't know (sorry) how these texts are viewed at Johns
> Hopkins.

How about in European and Middle Eastern Universities?

Next message: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"
In reply to: Elaine Keown: "Re: [hebrew] Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script (was Re: why Aramaic now)"
Next in thread: Elaine Keown: "Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script (was Re: why Aramaic now)"
Reply: Elaine Keown: "Re: Ancient Northwest Semitic Script (was Re: why Aramaic now)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 27 2003 - 19:44:17 EST