From: James Kass (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2007 - 09:55:56 CDT
>> I am certain that what was meant was, "If the allocation of CJKV code
>> points continues to be done in this way, then modern CJKV coverage
>> will require not only BMP and plane 2 support but also, in the
>> future, plane 3 support."
>I'm uncertain as to what the problem being discussed is. Once you have
>support for plane 2, you automatically support plane 3 (and planes 4, 5,
>6, etc.) at least from an encoding perspective (UTF-xx). ...
If I recall correctly, the Internet Explorer browser supported
UTF-8 for Plane Two long before it supported UTF-8 for Plane One.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 26 2007 - 09:57:50 CDT