Hasn't http://www.unicode.org/standard/where/#Variant_Shapes explained it
once and for all?
Leo
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:42 AM, <dzo_at_bisharat.net> wrote:
> FWIW, a blog post prompted by discussions in the wake of a DejaVu font use
> of N-form over n-form capital ŋ ("eng" or "engma"):
>
> "The 'eng' times for unified capital ŋ?"
> http://niamey.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-eng-times-for-unified-capital.html
>
> It's not a new issue, but was leaving the two main forms of capital eng as
> variants of one character the best course of action? In any event, it's
> probably more complex to disunify now (if that were to be decided) than it
> would have been, say, 10-12 years ago.
>
> Don Osborn
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 12 2013 - 09:32:39 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 12 2013 - 09:32:41 CST