From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Oct 29 2003 - 17:30:55 CST
On 29/10/2003 15:07, John Cowan wrote:
>Not necessarily. A process may check its input for normalization and
>reject it if it is not normalized, and XML consumers are encouraged
>(not required) to do so.
This looks to me like a clear breach of C9, at least of the derived
> no process can assume that another process will make a distinction
> between two different, but canonical-equivalent character sequences.
Another process may not be assumed to make a distinction between
normalised and non-normalised forms and so may not be assumed to
normalise, accurately or at all.
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org (personal) email@example.com (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:25 CST