From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Nov 15 2003 - 13:31:04 EST
From: "Peter Kirk" <email@example.com>
> On 15/11/2003 09:08, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> >... (also in Hebrew and Arabic
> >for vowel points and marks which should better be entered with a logical
> >order after the base letter, even if they produce combining sequences to
> >application through the WM_CHAR event).
> I'm not sure of your point here. In both Hebrew and Arabic vowel points
> come logically after their base characters and so in the same order as
> in Unicode - with a few insignificant exceptions. The canonical order of
> points after any one base character is not the logical typing order, but
> as canonically equivalent sequences are supposed to be processed the
> same there is no need for a keyboard to ensure that it generates the
> canonical order.
He was thinking about dead keys under Windows, and assuming that a Hebrew
keyboard would use the vowels and points as dead keys. Now there is no
keyboard I know of that does this, but it is what he was thinking....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 15 2003 - 14:03:16 EST