From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2003 - 20:58:52 EST
†The Indian govít doc at http://tdil.mit.gov.in/ori-guru-telu.pdf describes the conjunct shown in the attached PNG as being pronounced as though NNA + VIRAMA + DDA (0B21). The component attached to the NNA otherwise represents TA (0B24), however.
My question is this: should this conjunct be encoded as < 0B23 NNA, 0B4D VIRAMA, 0B24 TA > or as < 0B23 NNA, 0B4D VIRAMA, 0B21 DDA >?
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 26 2003 - 21:52:34 EST