- Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Exclamation mark comma"
- Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Constable: "RE: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Everson: "RE: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Constable: "RE: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Everson: "RE: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
The Indian gov’t doc at http://tdil.mit.gov.in/ori-guru-telu.pdf describes the conjunct shown in the attached PNG as being pronounced as though NNA + VIRAMA + DDA (0B21). The component attached to the NNA otherwise represents TA (0B24), however.
My question is this: should this conjunct be encoded as < 0B23 NNA, 0B4D VIRAMA, 0B24 TA > or as < 0B23 NNA, 0B4D VIRAMA, 0B21 DDA >?
Peter
Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division
- Next message: Mark Davis: "Unicode Membership Collateral"
- Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Exclamation mark comma"
- Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Constable: "RE: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Everson: "RE: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Constable: "RE: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Everson: "RE: Oriya: nndda / nnta?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 26 2003 - 21:52:34 EST