From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 13:12:23 EST
At 18:50 +0100 2004-01-15, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>My remark is still valid: Klingon is not Latin, even if there's a
>font that tries to represent Latin letters by creating Latin digraph
>ligatures into Klingon letters that break the conformance
>requirement for Latin letters.
Oh, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop.....
I wrote some words in Klingon. I wrote them in the Latin script. John
observed that this was more proof that Klingon was conventionally
written in the Latin script, which it is. It is not conventionally
written in the pIqaD. That's why pIqaD has not been encoded in the
Unicode Standard. Enthusiasts use it decoratively; that's why it was
given a CSUR encodinng.
It's embarrassing to see someone going to such lengths to show what
an expert he is about this when he is just utterly wrong.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 15 2004 - 13:58:04 EST