Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 14:35:08 CDT

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Phoenician numbers"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Next in thread: Ernest Cline: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 19:13 +0000 2004-05-22, James Kass wrote:
>Peter Kirk wrote,
>
>> There has now been nearly a month to gain experience on this issue.
>> During this time there have been several hundred postings related to
> > locales.

Actually they were related to ISO 15924, which is a different thing
from the locales.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Phoenician numbers"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Next in thread: Ernest Cline: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 22 2004 - 14:35:49 CDT