Re: Looking for transcription or transliteration standards latin- >arabic

From: Ted Hopp (ted.hopp@newslate.com)
Date: Fri Jul 09 2004 - 08:28:38 CDT

Next message: Mark Davis: "Re: Looking for transcription or transliteration standards latin- >arabic"

Previous message: Peter Jacobi: "[OT] ISO 8859-12"
In reply to: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Looking for transcription or transliteration standards latin- >arabic"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Looking for transcription or transliteration standards latin- >arabic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Pronunciation keys in dictionaries are a kind of transliteration. We still
need those (well, I do, at least).

Ted

On Friday, July 09, 2004 1:08 AM, Jony Rosenne wrote:
> Now that we have moved from the world of typewriters, that imposed
technical
> constraints on the writer, such as being able to use only the limited set
of
> characters implemented, to the world of Unicode which removes this
> constraint, transliteration is no longer needed or useful.

Ted Hopp, Ph.D.
ZigZag, Inc.
ted.hopp@newSLATE.com
+1-301-990-7453

newSLATE is your personal learning workspace
...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/

Next message: Mark Davis: "Re: Looking for transcription or transliteration standards latin- >arabic"
Previous message: Peter Jacobi: "[OT] ISO 8859-12"
In reply to: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Looking for transcription or transliteration standards latin- >arabic"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Looking for transcription or transliteration standards latin- >arabic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 09 2004 - 08:30:36 CDT