Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?

From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Tue Jul 27 2004 - 13:53:09 CDT

Next message: Mike Ayers: "RE: Much better Latin-1 keyboard for Windows"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
In reply to: Eric Muller: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
Next in thread: Philipp Reichmuth: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 27/07/2004 18:29, Eric Muller wrote:

> Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
>
>>
>> Unicode exists to support what people use. Do people use Latin
>> script for Tatar? Evidence indicates that they do. Should Unicode
>> support it, then? Certainly. Does Unicode support it? Yes, Unicode
>> supports the Latin script, with gobs of extensions. So what's the
>> problem?
>
>
> Latin n with descender, which is not encoded but needed according to
> <http://www.eki.ee/letter/chardata.cgi?lang=tt+Tatar&script=latin
>
> Eric.
>
Possibly needed, but the sources I have seen suggest that this letter is
actually an eng, 014A/014B, or else N with tilde is used. It is
pronounced like a phonetic eng.

-- 
Peter Kirk
peter@qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/

Next message: Mike Ayers: "RE: Much better Latin-1 keyboard for Windows"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
In reply to: Eric Muller: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
Next in thread: Philipp Reichmuth: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 27 2004 - 13:53:38 CDT