Re: Errors in TUS Figure 15.2?

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Tue Aug 03 2004 - 21:49:36 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Warenzeichen"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: UAX 15 hangul composition"
In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: Errors in TUS Figure 15.2?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Patrick Andries wrote:

> Also, the Unicode 1.0 name may have been better in this regard :
> « LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O E ».

I can think of quite a few Unicode 1.0 names that I prefer to the 1.1
names.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Warenzeichen"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: UAX 15 hangul composition"
In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: Errors in TUS Figure 15.2?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 03 2004 - 21:50:21 CDT