Re: Siddham

From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven (asmodai@in-nomine.org)
Date: Wed May 21 2008 - 02:46:05 CDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Siddham"

Previous message: Jim Allan: "Re: Exemplifying apostrophes"
In reply to: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven: "Siddham"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Siddham"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Siddham"
Reply: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp: "Re: [unicode] Re: Siddham"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

-On [20080511 15:43], Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven (asmodai@in-nomine.org) wrote:
>I see Michael Everson has a proposal for Siddham worked out, yet why is it
>not even in consideration for inclusion yet?

No one has even a vague idea of why not? :-\

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind..?

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Siddham"
Previous message: Jim Allan: "Re: Exemplifying apostrophes"
In reply to: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven: "Siddham"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Siddham"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Siddham"
Reply: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp: "Re: [unicode] Re: Siddham"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 21 2008 - 02:49:49 CDT