RE: ZWJ+ZWNJ+ZWJ (Was: ZWJ and Turkish)

From: John Hudson (tiro@tiro.com)
Date: Wed Oct 10 2001 - 19:01:25 EDT


At 15:35 10/10/2001, Paul Nelson wrote:

>Why would you do something like this? These are control characters and
>should not be played with. The shaping engine should set the shapes of
>the charaters on either side correctly. Since glyphs for control
>characters are not normally displayed there is no reason for this
>lookup. Actually, your lookup stuff will not effect the text at all
>because the shaping is determined before you ever start glyphing.
>
>Unicode operations with characters have priority over glyphing.

Of course. Thanks, Paul. That makes perfect sense and I can forget all
about it from a font perspective. Good. Roozbeh had me confused by asking
whether fonts would be able to handle this 'worst thing in Unicode'; I
should have realised that it isn't a font issue.

Can I ask what Uniscribe would do if it encountered Roozbeh's ZWJ+ZWNJ+ZJW
character string? Perhaps it would help if Roozbeh explained why he sees
this as a problem.

John Hudson

Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC tiro@tiro.com

Type is something that you can pick up and hold in your hand.
                                                   - Harry Carter



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 10 2001 - 17:39:35 EDT