From: JFC Morfin (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jun 22 2007 - 08:44:16 CDT
At 07:56 20/06/2007, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
>-On [20070619 14:48], JFC Morfin (email@example.com) wrote:
> > I was recently invited in an ad-hoc ISO meeting over a proposed NWIP
> > concerning an internationalized version of the Country Codes (the
> most used
> > standard).
>Pardon me if I am missing the point, but what was the purpose of your email?
>Was it merely to inform the people on this list or to request feedback on the
>issue 'internationalized'? Because, to me, it was not very clear from your
>If you could clarify/elaborate, please do so.
This is a Unicode terminology question. Is the "internationalised
(non-ASCII)" equivalence always acceptable in Unicode people's mind.
For example, I do not understand "internationalised" as excluding
ASCII. The IETF IDN routines do not exclude ASCII domain name. I just
want to know if there is a common definition or not. If not that
might create misunderstanding or unnecessary problem we can still
correct since the NWIP is under circulation.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 22 2007 - 08:49:57 CDT