From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Jan 04 2009 - 04:02:57 CST
On 4 Jan 2009, at 05:42, Asmus Freytag wrote:
> "/Compatibility Character. /
> A character that would not have been encoded except for compatibility
> and round-trip convertibility with other standards"
> If you emember that the word standard as used in that definition is
> restricted to international standards, or formal standards, but
> de-facto standards as well,
Then the ConScript de-facto Standard contains candidates for encoding?
It has already given us Phaistos, Deseret, and Shavian.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 04 2009 - 04:05:06 CST